N-95 Respirator fit-testing required for US postal carriers to receive a “Household Antibiotic Kit” (doxycycline) for use during an Anthrax attack

On October 3, 2008 a letter was sent from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)/HHS Deputy Commissioner for Policy (Randall Lutter, Ph.D.) to the Director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA)/HHS (Robin Robinson, Ph.D) in response to BARDA’s request for the FDA “to issue an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the pre-event provision and potential use of doxycycline hyclate tablet emergency kits for inhalational anthrax…specifically for eligible United States Postal Service (USPS) participants in the Cities Readiness Initiative (CRI)…and their household members.” The complete 17-page pdf can be accessed via the FDA website at: www.fda.gov/Cder/drugprepare/EUA_doxycycline.pdf  A list of the CRI’s 72 cities and metropolitan areas in the 50 US states, as of April 2, 2008, is posted on the CDC website at: www.bt.cdc.gov/cri/facts.asp

A brief but critically important reference in the letter from the FDA to BARDA appears on page 9, and in a footnote (#20) on page 12, stating the requirement for successful N-95 respirator fit-testing in order for US Postal Service (USPS) postal carriers to be eligible to receive the Household Antibiotic Kit (HAK):

Page 9: “Policies and procedures must also include screening for fitness to receive OSHA-required personal protective equipment (PPE) (i.e., N-95 masks) and provision of PPE to eligible USPS participants. “

Page 12: “USPS postal carriers are not eligible to receive a doxycycline hycalte tablet emergency kit if they have not passed their N-95 mask fit test.”

The explicit rationale for successful N-95 fit-testing is not stated in this letter. Given that inhalational anthrax is NOT transmitted from person-to-person, however, the rationale is most likely due to concern that anthrax spores in the environment following an aerosolized release (attack) might put the postal carriers at risk of infection when they are delivering preventive antibiotics to persons in their homes.

If this is the actual rationale for use of N-95 respirators as part of the PPE to be worn by postal workers delivering antibiotics to the homes of persons who were possibly exposed to aerosolized anthrax spores as part of the Cities Readiness Initiative, then a key part of the associated risk communication will need to focus on explaining this rationale to the general public, who are unlikely to have N-95 respirators for their own use. 

Such risk communication could be a formidable challenge.